If you’re a female or have a woman-assigned body, you likely realize this individually: There is lots of horrific information out there on the internet approximately your reproductive machine.

Zoe Mendelson definitely does. A few years in the past, she got into a debate with a man she turned into seeing over a pretty simple question: “Can all girls squirt?” As one does, she took to Google to settle the uncertainty. “I changed into reading all this bullshit, so I went into medical journals trying to figure it out and I couldn’t understand whatever,” says Mendelson, a freelance journalist based totally in Mexico City (who, disclosure, has written for Fast Company). “I realized I didn’t recognize any of the parts they were mentioning, or in which they had been in my body.”

Mendelson’s search for a trustworthy solution reflected the revel in such a lot of girls have in seeking records approximately their health and our bodies. The fact that medical doctors regularly dismiss or downplay girls’ health worries is nicely documented. When it comes to troubles of reproductive health—pain at some stage in intercourse, heavy periods, debilitating cramps—the response “it’s regular for you” is normally used to close down questions.

But Mendelson wasn’t settling for it. Frustrated with the lack of clean facts available online, and the inscrutable diagrams accompanying it, she reached out to her buddy, the artist María Conejo, with a concept: To make a crowdsourced, accessible, statistics-packed online aid especially about the female anatomy and reproductive system. That resource, referred to as Pussypedia, launched on July 1. It’s to be had in both Spanish and English, and Mendelson and Conejo worked with a various array of over a hundred artists and journalists to p.C. It with records. Everything posted on the web page is “hyper reality-checked,” Mendelson says, through gynecologists and scientific researchers (although it isn’t, they emphasize, an alternative to an in-person medical opinion). They also include curated and vetted information from elsewhere at the web, like clinical journals, but choose the maximum important and complete to avoid the “net wormhole” that Mendelson descended into at some stage in her very own Google seek. Initially funded on Kickstarter, the entire manner of assembling Pussypedia took just underneath years.

Mendelson and Conejo use the term “pussy,” they are saying because it’s each comprehensive and inclusive. The word “vagina,” which is most commonly used, refers handiest to 1 precise a part of the lady reproductive device. Through the aid, they want to “reclaim” the phrase pussy to suggest “a few mixtures of vagina, vulva, clitoris, uterus, bladder, rectum, anus, and who is aware of maybe some testes,” the co-creators write at the website online, citing the shortage of good enough language for the lady anatomy. They also notice that even as they may be each cisgender girls and the useful resource relates mainly to girl-assigned anatomy, “the site’s recognition on genitalia pursuits to cope with this particular facts hole, no longer to suggest that this part of the body defines sex or gender,” the founders write. “To be clean, our pussies do now not make us women. Many human beings with pussies aren’t ladies, and plenty of women do no longer have pussies.” Mendelson and Conejo add that as missing because the facts are for cis ladies, it’s even more nonexistent for trans, non-binary, and intersex people, and emphasize that the paintings in Pussypedia is a starting, and could expand to include assets for ways greater genders and expressions.

But they’re running to make the records that they gift as handy as viable. The bilingual issue is, in particular, vital to for the resource’s attained, Conejo says. Growing up in Mexico, “we didn’t have any sex training, or if we did, it changed into from a spiritual perspective,” she says. “Women are raised with a lot disgrace about their own sexuality, and if they experience there’s something wrong with their body, they examine not to talk approximately it.” Creating a resource that women can appear too, without judgment, for solutions, became essential, she says, and Conejo and Mendelson wish that Pussypedia proves beneficial for ladies from an expansion of contexts.

Because it’s online, the resource is designed to be ever-evolving. But there are numerous core capabilities that Conejo and Mendelson desired to make certain had been in location whilst it released. One is an interactive, 3-d version of the complete reproductive gadget, to treatment the unintelligible 2-D diagrams Mendelson encountered on her very own information search. And there are lots of articles addressing complex issues like infections and painful sex, debunking tendencies like vaginal steaming (probably not a terrific idea, regardless of what Goop says), and delving into the often-distressing history around reproductive rights and girls’ healthcare. The whole aid, Mendelson and Conejo desire, is intended to make everybody with questions about their frame sense like a person is listening—and most significantly, offering up the facts they need, no judgment connected.